Movie Review - Blood From The Mummy's Tomb

Blood From The Mummy's Tomb

1971

Production Companies:  Hammer Films & EMI Films

The first thing I noticed when watching this movie is the gaping distance between this and the horror movies of today.  There are two glaringly obvious differences.

Firstly:  Scope.  This film takes you to Egypt and the tombs of the Pharaohs where we see the Queen being interred in her tomb and the rights the priest's carry out, along with the beginnings of her curse.  We then move to England where the action continues between three different locations.  In modern horror films, the story usually takes place in one location in one time period.

Secondly:  Story.  There's more going off in this film than most of today's horror.  I know this is based on an actual novel where most of the modern films are based on the director's ideas.  The end product can also suffer from budgetary issues which may restrict them to one location and hence hinder the story.

The other differences are acting talent and direction.  I have to admit that Hammer used to get some pretty top notch actors in their films.  Even the bit-parts are covered by a better-than-average cast and this is the case in this film.  Due to that fact, this is a highly enjoyable and believable story that I found myself fully immersed in.  It also didn't hurt that Valerie Leon is one of the most beautiful actresses on the planet and does a great job in the lead role as Margaret Fuchs and the Egyptian Queen Tera.  Along with Andre Keir, who people from Dr Who: Dalek's Invasion Earth 2150AD and Quatermass and the Pit, and James Villiers this is a strong cast.

As for the directing, it was an absolute blessing not to see shaky cam.  I do wish that more directors would invest in fixed and smooth-moving camera mounts.  I remember there being some negative input for the Evil-Deads shaky cam through the woods - now that is some of the smoothest camera work when compared to today's efforts.  Also, all the scenes are watchable in daylight.  Dark scenes are lit and visible, with the director using lighting to build mood and atmosphere; the viewer doesn't have to turn off any lighting even ambient just to make out what's happening - just because a scene is shot in total darkness doesn't make it scary.  There's also no grey filters, which are so overused today, everything is shot in glorious colour.  This actually helps the film as it doesn't make the audience depressed and sad.

Though the special effects are outdated by today's standards they are few, as the director uses the story and the atmosphere to build up the tension, suspense, and horror.  Though the effects that are used are passable.  I did love the severed hand - you can't beat a good severed hand - and the constantly bleeding stub its decapitation left behind.

This is one truly lush and lavish, well shot and acted horror film which still has strength in today's horror market.  I would recommend everybody to watch this film as it's one of the best Hammer released.  I would even watch this one again... and probably sooner rather than later.